Global goal on adaptation
The has a goal for cutting emissions that everyone can measure in tonnes. Its goal for protecting people from climate impacts was much vaguer.
At COP30, countries agreed a list of 59 ways to measure it, such as how many people have early warning systems or safe water. Using them is voluntary. Now they have to agree how the list is actually put to work.
Follow-up to the Belém Adaptation Indicators adopted at CMA 7, including work under the two-year Belém-Addis Vision on Adaptation.
CMA 7 adopted 59 of the 100 indicators proposed by experts, concluding the UAE–Belém work programme on indicators. The indicators are voluntary.
The decision acknowledged gaps in data, baselines and methodologies.
Heatwaves, floods and droughts are already here. This decides how progress on protecting people gets measured.

The Paris Agreement creates a , but without a way to measure it.

Countries adopt a framework with targets for water, food, health and other areas, and two years to find .

59 indicators are adopted out of 100 proposed by experts. Using them is voluntary.
Bonn could not agree how to put the indicators to work, or whether to mention the pledge to triple finance. The unfinished text was passed on to COP31. Source
Where COP31 picks up: COP30 agreed 59 voluntary indicators. Bonn could not agree how to use them; COP31 picks up the unfinished text.
Have COPs worked? The bigger picture →From the provisional agendas, FCCC/CP/2026/1 and FCCC/PA/CMA/2026/1. Draft texts, versions and bracket counts appear here once talks open.
This question carries on from COP30 (see How we got here, above). Talks resume on 9 November: from then, every new draft and every change of status is listed here, with the time and a link to the document.